2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Western Michigan logo

Western Michigan

5–2 · Unranked

VS.
Rice logo

Rice

1–6 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Western Michigan by 9.8

Western Michigan · 84%Rice · 16%

Projected Western Michigan 29 – Rice 20. Expected total 49.1 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Western Michigan: 89% for Western Michigan · At Rice: 22% for Rice.

MetricWestern MichiganRice
Current record5–21–6
Conference record3–00–3
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-2.5-15.4
FPI rank#81#124
Points per game26.221.0
Total yards per game322.3318.6
Passing yards per game157.678.7
Rushing yards per game164.7239.9
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game19.231.8
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks16.010.0
Tackles for loss27.043.0
Current-Season RésuméWestern MichiganRice
Overall Record5–21–6
Conference Record3–00–3
Strength of Record#61#128
Strength of Schedule#104#56
Remaining SOS#128#88
Game Control#69#124
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.