2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Western Kentucky logo

Western Kentucky

3–4 · Unranked

VS.
Middle Tennessee logo

Middle Tennessee

3–3 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Western Kentucky by 3.0

Western Kentucky · 62%Middle Tennessee · 38%

Projected Western Kentucky 28 – Middle Tennessee 25. Expected total 52.9 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Western Kentucky: 72% for Western Kentucky · At Middle Tennessee: 48% for Middle Tennessee.

MetricWestern KentuckyMiddle Tennessee
Current record3–43–3
Conference record2–11–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-11.9-18.3
FPI rank#110#130
Points per game21.323.9
Total yards per game353.0396.2
Passing yards per game218.3234.0
Rushing yards per game134.7162.2
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game31.129.6
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks9.07.0
Tackles for loss32.019.0
Current-Season RésuméWestern KentuckyMiddle Tennessee
Overall Record3–43–3
Conference Record2–11–1
Strength of Record#99#111
Strength of Schedule#30#123
Remaining SOS#108#106
Game Control#101#119
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.