2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
West Virginia logo

West Virginia

4–3 · Unranked

VS.
Utah logo

Utah

6–0 · #3 AP Top 25

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Utah by 17.6

West Virginia · 5%Utah · 95%

Projected West Virginia 22 – Utah 40. Expected total 61.4 points. No home-field adjustment.

At West Virginia: 7% for West Virginia · At Utah: 97% for Utah.

MetricWest VirginiaUtah
Current record4–36–0
Conference record1–33–0
AP Top 25 rank—#3
FPI0.417.4
FPI rank#67#13
Points per game35.938.9
Total yards per game497.1486.7
Passing yards per game224.7266.3
Rushing yards per game272.4220.3
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game32.315.9
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.010.0
Tackles for loss43.026.0
Current-Season RésuméWest VirginiaUtah
Overall Record4–36–0
Conference Record1–33–0
Strength of Record#66#13
Strength of Schedule#84#102
Remaining SOS#12#39
Game Control#74#5
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.