2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Vanderbilt logo

Vanderbilt

3–4 · Unranked

VS.
Auburn logo

Auburn

4–2 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Auburn by 7.8

Vanderbilt · 21%Auburn · 79%

Projected Vanderbilt 22 – Auburn 30. Expected total 51.9 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Vanderbilt: 29% for Vanderbilt · At Auburn: 85% for Auburn.

MetricVanderbiltAuburn
Current record3–44–2
Conference record0–42–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI0.513.4
FPI rank#66#21
Points per game22.824.1
Total yards per game354.4393.7
Passing yards per game235.1211.7
Rushing yards per game119.3182.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game30.326.8
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.016.0
Tackles for loss28.041.0
Current-Season RésuméVanderbiltAuburn
Overall Record3–44–2
Conference Record0–42–2
Strength of Record#78#22
Strength of Schedule#19#8
Remaining SOS#5#13
Game Control#96#27
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.