2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Utah State logo

Utah State

2–4 · Unranked

VS.
Utah logo

Utah

6–0 · #3 AP Top 25

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Utah by 21.1

Utah State · 3%Utah · 97%

Projected Utah State 13 – Utah 34. Expected total 46.8 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Utah State: 4% for Utah State · At Utah: 98% for Utah.

MetricUtah StateUtah
Current record2–46–0
Conference record1–13–0
AP Top 25 rank—#3
FPI-7.617.4
FPI rank#96#13
Points per game16.938.9
Total yards per game310.0486.7
Passing yards per game189.8266.3
Rushing yards per game120.2220.3
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game21.915.9
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks9.010.0
Tackles for loss28.026.0
Current-Season RésuméUtah StateUtah
Overall Record2–46–0
Conference Record1–13–0
Strength of Record#103#13
Strength of Schedule#47#102
Remaining SOS#71#39
Game Control#109#5
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.