2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Utah logo

Utah

6–0 · #3 AP Top 25

VS.
Iowa State logo

Iowa State

3–3 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Utah by 13.5

Utah · 91%Iowa State · 9%

Projected Utah 35 – Iowa State 21. Expected total 55.5 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Utah: 94% for Utah · At Iowa State: 13% for Iowa State.

MetricUtahIowa State
Current record6–03–3
Conference record3–01–2
AP Top 25 rank#3—
FPI17.44.3
FPI rank#13#54
Points per game38.929.0
Total yards per game486.7359.7
Passing yards per game266.3178.2
Rushing yards per game220.3181.5
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game15.927.3
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks10.09.0
Tackles for loss26.032.0
Current-Season RésuméUtahIowa State
Overall Record6–03–3
Conference Record3–01–2
Strength of Record#13#62
Strength of Schedule#102#28
Remaining SOS#39#49
Game Control#5#52
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.