2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
UTSA
6–1 · Unranked
Rice
1–6 · Unranked
UTSA by 12.0
UTSA · 89%Rice · 11%
Projected UTSA 34 – Rice 22. Expected total 56.1 points. No home-field adjustment.
At UTSA: 92% for UTSA · At Rice: 17% for Rice.
Current record6–11–6
Conference record3–00–3
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-1.9-15.4
FPI rank#77#124
Points per game33.521.0
Total yards per game410.9318.6
Passing yards per game231.778.7
Rushing yards per game179.1239.9
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game26.031.8
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks6.010.0
Tackles for loss30.043.0
Overall Record6–11–6
Conference Record3–00–3
Strength of Record#31#128
Strength of Schedule#78#56
Remaining SOS#92#88
Game Control#80#124
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.