2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
UTSA logo

UTSA

6–1 · Unranked

VS.
Florida Atlantic logo

Florida Atlantic

4–2 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

UTSA by 5.6

UTSA · 72%Florida Atlantic · 28%

Projected UTSA 36 – Florida Atlantic 30. Expected total 66.5 points. No home-field adjustment.

At UTSA: 80% for UTSA · At Florida Atlantic: 37% for Florida Atlantic.

MetricUTSAFlorida Atlantic
Current record6–14–2
Conference record3–01–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-1.9-10.1
FPI rank#77#107
Points per game33.537.8
Total yards per game410.9422.3
Passing yards per game231.7307.3
Rushing yards per game179.1115.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game26.035.8
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks6.08.0
Tackles for loss30.029.0
Current-Season RésuméUTSAFlorida Atlantic
Overall Record6–14–2
Conference Record3–01–1
Strength of Record#31#67
Strength of Schedule#78#93
Remaining SOS#92#80
Game Control#80#67
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.