2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
UTEP
1–6 · Unranked
North Dakota State
6–1 · Unranked
North Dakota State by 25.3
UTEP · 1%North Dakota State · 99%
Projected UTEP 10 – North Dakota State 35. Expected total 45.3 points. No home-field adjustment.
At UTEP: 2% for UTEP · At North Dakota State: 99% for North Dakota State.
Current record1–66–1
Conference record0–33–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-24.4-0.2
FPI rank#136#71
Points per game14.128.1
Total yards per game286.3362.0
Passing yards per game151.9187.3
Rushing yards per game134.4174.7
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game36.511.9
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks8.012.0
Tackles for loss32.033.0
Overall Record1–66–1
Conference Record0–33–1
Strength of Record#133#44
Strength of Schedule#50#132
Remaining SOS#102#83
Game Control#129#46
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.