2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
UTEP logo

UTEP

1–6 · Unranked

VS.
Air Force logo

Air Force

5–1 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Air Force by 21.1

UTEP · 3%Air Force · 97%

Projected UTEP 15 – Air Force 36. Expected total 50.7 points. No home-field adjustment.

At UTEP: 4% for UTEP · At Air Force: 98% for Air Force.

MetricUTEPAir Force
Current record1–65–1
Conference record0–33–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-24.4-2.1
FPI rank#136#79
Points per game14.129.3
Total yards per game286.3407.0
Passing yards per game151.964.0
Rushing yards per game134.4343.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game36.521.5
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks8.08.0
Tackles for loss32.019.0
Current-Season RésuméUTEPAir Force
Overall Record1–65–1
Conference Record0–33–1
Strength of Record#133#49
Strength of Schedule#50#136
Remaining SOS#102#79
Game Control#129#94
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.