2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
USC logo

USC

6–1 · #18 AP Top 25

VS.
Wisconsin logo

Wisconsin

4–2 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

USC by 1.5

USC · 56%Wisconsin · 44%

Projected USC 25 – Wisconsin 24. Expected total 48.7 points. No home-field adjustment.

At USC: 66% for USC · At Wisconsin: 54% for Wisconsin.

MetricUSCWisconsin
Current record6–14–2
Conference record3–12–1
AP Top 25 rank#18—
FPI14.99.0
FPI rank#17#39
Points per game32.423.6
Total yards per game462.4351.8
Passing yards per game310.1199.7
Rushing yards per game152.3152.2
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game24.217.1
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.08.0
Tackles for loss30.025.0
Current-Season RésuméUSCWisconsin
Overall Record6–14–2
Conference Record3–12–1
Strength of Record#18#33
Strength of Schedule#52#20
Remaining SOS#4#65
Game Control#25#38
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.