2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
UL Monroe logo

UL Monroe

0–6 · Unranked

VS.
Mississippi State logo

Mississippi State

4–2 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Mississippi State by 25.3

UL Monroe · 1%Mississippi State · 99%

Projected UL Monroe 15 – Mississippi State 41. Expected total 56.0 points. No home-field adjustment.

At UL Monroe: 2% for UL Monroe · At Mississippi State: 99% for Mississippi State.

MetricUL MonroeMississippi State
Current record0–64–2
Conference record0–22–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-26.39.1
FPI rank#137#38
Points per game20.326.6
Total yards per game341.3454.3
Passing yards per game220.8277.8
Rushing yards per game120.5176.5
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game37.028.1
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks9.015.0
Tackles for loss27.032.0
Current-Season RésuméUL MonroeMississippi State
Overall Record0–64–2
Conference Record0–22–2
Strength of Record#137#20
Strength of Schedule#117#5
Remaining SOS#113#26
Game Control#137#33
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.