2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
UCLA logo

UCLA

6–0 · #5 AP Top 25

VS.
Minnesota logo

Minnesota

4–2 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

UCLA by 13.1

UCLA · 90%Minnesota · 10%

Projected UCLA 30 – Minnesota 17. Expected total 46.3 points. No home-field adjustment.

At UCLA: 93% for UCLA · At Minnesota: 14% for Minnesota.

MetricUCLAMinnesota
Current record6–04–2
Conference record4–02–1
AP Top 25 rank#5—
FPI11.0-0.2
FPI rank#31#72
Points per game33.525.3
Total yards per game445.8341.3
Passing yards per game214.8236.5
Rushing yards per game231.0104.8
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game13.420.5
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks12.014.0
Tackles for loss32.042.0
Current-Season RésuméUCLAMinnesota
Overall Record6–04–2
Conference Record4–02–1
Strength of Record#3#42
Strength of Schedule#51#81
Remaining SOS#64#15
Game Control#12#66
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.