2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
UAB logo

UAB

4–3 · Unranked

VS.
Temple logo

Temple

2–5 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Temple by 1.2

UAB · 45%Temple · 55%

Projected UAB 24 – Temple 25. Expected total 48.6 points. No home-field adjustment.

At UAB: 56% for UAB · At Temple: 65% for Temple.

MetricUABTemple
Current record4–32–5
Conference record2–11–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-13.8-9.3
FPI rank#117#104
Points per game21.623.6
Total yards per game339.0386.0
Passing yards per game171.0183.6
Rushing yards per game168.0202.4
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.326.6
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.09.0
Tackles for loss37.022.0
Current-Season RésuméUABTemple
Overall Record4–32–5
Conference Record2–11–2
Strength of Record#89#124
Strength of Schedule#112#111
Remaining SOS#86#91
Game Control#127#106
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.