2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
UAB
4–3 · Unranked
Memphis
5–2 · Unranked
Memphis by 12.5
UAB · 11%Memphis · 89%
Projected UAB 21 – Memphis 33. Expected total 54.0 points. No home-field adjustment.
At UAB: 15% for UAB · At Memphis: 93% for Memphis.
Current record4–35–2
Conference record2–12–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-13.83.0
FPI rank#117#57
Points per game21.637.6
Total yards per game339.0512.6
Passing yards per game171.0274.9
Rushing yards per game168.0237.7
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.323.6
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.016.0
Tackles for loss37.040.0
Overall Record4–35–2
Conference Record2–12–1
Strength of Record#89#57
Strength of Schedule#112#100
Remaining SOS#86#96
Game Control#127#55
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.