2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Toledo logo

Toledo

5–2 · Unranked

VS.
Sacramento State logo

Sacramento State

1–6 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Toledo by 21.0

Toledo · 97%Sacramento State · 3%

Projected Toledo 38 – Sacramento State 17. Expected total 55.0 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Toledo: 98% for Toledo · At Sacramento State: 4% for Sacramento State.

MetricToledoSacramento State
Current record5–21–6
Conference record2–10–4
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-3.4-32.4
FPI rank#84#138
Points per game37.417.0
Total yards per game459.0302.3
Passing yards per game273.4194.7
Rushing yards per game185.6107.6
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.430.3
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks20.08.0
Tackles for loss41.027.0
Current-Season RésuméToledoSacramento State
Overall Record5–21–6
Conference Record2–10–4
Strength of Record#88#136
Strength of Schedule#137#135
Remaining SOS#125#131
Game Control#111#137
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.