2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
Toledo
5–2 · Unranked
Eastern Michigan
4–4 · Unranked
Toledo by 12.4
Toledo · 89%Eastern Michigan · 11%
Projected Toledo 34 – Eastern Michigan 21. Expected total 54.9 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Toledo: 93% for Toledo · At Eastern Michigan: 16% for Eastern Michigan.
Current record5–24–4
Conference record2–13–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-3.4-16.7
FPI rank#84#128
Points per game37.421.3
Total yards per game459.0320.0
Passing yards per game273.4215.0
Rushing yards per game185.6105.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.425.7
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks20.012.0
Tackles for loss41.036.0
Overall Record5–24–4
Conference Record2–13–1
Strength of Record#88#114
Strength of Schedule#137#119
Remaining SOS#125#109
Game Control#111#120
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.