2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Data is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later.
Tennessee logo

Tennessee

— · Unranked

VS.
Vanderbilt logo

Vanderbilt

— · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Tennessee by 15.4

Tennessee · 93%Vanderbilt · 7%

Projected Tennessee 33 – Vanderbilt 18. Expected total 50.8 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Tennessee: 96% for Tennessee · At Vanderbilt: 10% for Vanderbilt.

MetricTennesseeVanderbilt
Current record——
Conference record——
Current poll rank——
FPI——
FPI rank——
Points per game32.322.8
Total yards per game——
Passing yards per game——
Rushing yards per game——
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game16.330.3
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks——
Tackles for loss——
Current-Season RésuméTennesseeVanderbilt
Overall Record——
Conference Record——
Strength of Record——
Strength of Schedule——
Remaining SOS——
Game Control——
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Current-season Résumé data unavailable · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.