2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
Tennessee
6–1 · #16 AP Top 25
Texas A&M
4–3 · Unranked
Tennessee by 7.1
Tennessee · 77%Texas A&M · 23%
Projected Tennessee 27 – Texas A&M 20. Expected total 47.8 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Tennessee: 84% for Tennessee · At Texas A&M: 31% for Texas A&M.
Current record6–14–3
Conference record3–11–3
AP Top 25 rank#16—
FPI18.113.5
FPI rank#12#20
Points per game32.328.3
Total yards per game405.1356.9
Passing yards per game188.0195.4
Rushing yards per game217.1161.4
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game16.318.9
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks29.05.0
Tackles for loss57.032.0
Overall Record6–14–3
Conference Record3–11–3
Strength of Record#7#52
Strength of Schedule#23#33
Remaining SOS#18#1
Game Control#19#48
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.