2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Southern Miss logo

Southern Miss

1–5 · Unranked

VS.
UL Monroe logo

UL Monroe

0–6 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Southern Miss by 7.9

Southern Miss · 79%UL Monroe · 21%

Projected Southern Miss 33 – UL Monroe 25. Expected total 57.6 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Southern Miss: 85% for Southern Miss · At UL Monroe: 28% for UL Monroe.

MetricSouthern MissUL Monroe
Current record1–50–6
Conference record0–20–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-14.7-26.3
FPI rank#122#137
Points per game26.920.3
Total yards per game394.5341.3
Passing yards per game260.8220.8
Rushing yards per game133.7120.5
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game31.037.0
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks14.09.0
Tackles for loss36.027.0
Current-Season RésuméSouthern MissUL Monroe
Overall Record1–50–6
Conference Record0–20–2
Strength of Record#131#137
Strength of Schedule#95#117
Remaining SOS#93#113
Game Control#131#137
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.