2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
San José State logo

San José State

4–3 · Unranked

VS.
Eastern Michigan logo

Eastern Michigan

4–4 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

San José State by 3.0

San José State · 63%Eastern Michigan · 37%

Projected San José State 24 – Eastern Michigan 21. Expected total 44.6 points. No home-field adjustment.

At San José State: 72% for San José State · At Eastern Michigan: 48% for Eastern Michigan.

MetricSan José StateEastern Michigan
Current record4–34–4
Conference record2–13–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-12.5-16.7
FPI rank#112#128
Points per game19.921.3
Total yards per game384.7320.0
Passing yards per game246.0215.0
Rushing yards per game138.7105.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game22.325.7
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks27.012.0
Tackles for loss47.036.0
Current-Season RésuméSan José StateEastern Michigan
Overall Record4–34–4
Conference Record2–13–1
Strength of Record#97#114
Strength of Schedule#106#119
Remaining SOS#84#109
Game Control#97#120
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.