2026 current teamsHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Program History ComparisonShowing the latest available data.
Sacramento State
1–6 · Unranked
Eastern Michigan
4–4 · Unranked
Eastern Michigan by 8.6
Sacramento State · 19%Eastern Michigan · 81%
Projected Sacramento State 19 – Eastern Michigan 28. Expected total 47.2 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Sacramento State: 26% for Sacramento State · At Eastern Michigan: 87% for Eastern Michigan.
MetricSacramento StateEastern MichiganCurrent record1–64–4
Conference record0–43–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-32.4-16.7
FPI rank#138#128
Points per game17.021.3
Total yards per game302.3320.0
Passing yards per game194.7215.0
Rushing yards per game107.6105.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game30.325.7
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks8.012.0
Tackles for loss27.036.0
Current-Season RésuméSacramento StateEastern MichiganOverall Record1–64–4
Conference Record0–43–1
Strength of Record#136#114
Strength of Schedule#135#119
Remaining SOS#131#109
Game Control#137#120
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.
