2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

5–2 · Unranked

VS.
Miami logo

Miami

6–0 · #1 AP Top 25

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Miami by 12.5

Pittsburgh · 11%Miami · 89%

Projected Pittsburgh 23 – Miami 35. Expected total 58.5 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Pittsburgh: 15% for Pittsburgh · At Miami: 93% for Miami.

MetricPittsburghMiami
Current record5–26–0
Conference record2–24–0
AP Top 25 rank—#1
FPI9.226.5
FPI rank#37#4
Points per game31.947.6
Total yards per game450.1559.5
Passing yards per game284.6333.0
Rushing yards per game165.6226.5
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game19.817.8
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.018.0
Tackles for loss44.031.0
Current-Season RésuméPittsburghMiami
Overall Record5–26–0
Conference Record2–24–0
Strength of Record#41#5
Strength of Schedule#92#58
Remaining SOS#29#37
Game Control#42#2
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.