2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
Pittsburgh
5–2 · Unranked
California
3–4 · Unranked
Pittsburgh by 13.5
Pittsburgh · 91%California · 9%
Projected Pittsburgh 33 – California 20. Expected total 52.6 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Pittsburgh: 94% for Pittsburgh · At California: 13% for California.
Current record5–23–4
Conference record2–22–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI9.2-3.9
FPI rank#37#88
Points per game31.921.9
Total yards per game450.1378.4
Passing yards per game284.6288.1
Rushing yards per game165.690.3
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game19.831.6
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.013.0
Tackles for loss44.031.0
Overall Record5–23–4
Conference Record2–22–2
Strength of Record#41#86
Strength of Schedule#92#72
Remaining SOS#29#61
Game Control#42#104
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.