2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Ohio logo

Ohio

5–2 · Unranked

VS.
Sacramento State logo

Sacramento State

1–6 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Ohio by 17.0

Ohio · 95%Sacramento State · 5%

Projected Ohio 33 – Sacramento State 16. Expected total 49.4 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Ohio: 97% for Ohio · At Sacramento State: 8% for Sacramento State.

MetricOhioSacramento State
Current record5–21–6
Conference record3–00–4
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-7.1-32.4
FPI rank#95#138
Points per game29.617.0
Total yards per game371.3302.3
Passing yards per game164.3194.7
Rushing yards per game207.0107.6
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game21.930.3
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks13.08.0
Tackles for loss42.027.0
Current-Season RésuméOhioSacramento State
Overall Record5–21–6
Conference Record3–00–4
Strength of Record#76#136
Strength of Schedule#103#135
Remaining SOS#133#131
Game Control#92#137
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.