2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
North Dakota State logo

North Dakota State

6–1 · Unranked

VS.
Sacramento State logo

Sacramento State

1–6 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

North Dakota State by 24.8

North Dakota State · 99%Sacramento State · 1%

Projected North Dakota State 34 – Sacramento State 9. Expected total 43.7 points. No home-field adjustment.

At North Dakota State: 99% for North Dakota State · At Sacramento State: 2% for Sacramento State.

MetricNorth Dakota StateSacramento State
Current record6–11–6
Conference record3–10–4
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-0.2-32.4
FPI rank#71#138
Points per game28.117.0
Total yards per game362.0302.3
Passing yards per game187.3194.7
Rushing yards per game174.7107.6
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game11.930.3
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks12.08.0
Tackles for loss33.027.0
Current-Season RésuméNorth Dakota StateSacramento State
Overall Record6–11–6
Conference Record3–10–4
Strength of Record#44#136
Strength of Schedule#132#135
Remaining SOS#83#131
Game Control#46#137
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.