2026 current teamsHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Program History ComparisonShowing the latest available data.

New Mexico State
2–4 · Unranked
VS.
Middle Tennessee
3–3 · Unranked
CFB Intel Model · Neutral FieldNew Mexico State by 3.2
New Mexico State · 64%Middle Tennessee · 36%
Projected New Mexico State 27 – Middle Tennessee 23. Expected total 50.1 points. No home-field adjustment.
At New Mexico State: 73% for New Mexico State · At Middle Tennessee: 47% for Middle Tennessee.
MetricNew Mexico StateMiddle TennesseeCurrent record2–43–3
Conference record1–11–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-13.2-18.3
FPI rank#116#130
Points per game21.523.9
Total yards per game368.5396.2
Passing yards per game225.8234.0
Rushing yards per game142.7162.2
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.329.6
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.07.0
Tackles for loss38.019.0
Current-Season RésuméNew Mexico StateMiddle TennesseeOverall Record2–43–3
Conference Record1–11–1
Strength of Record#115#111
Strength of Schedule#96#123
Remaining SOS#129#106
Game Control#112#119
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.