2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Nevada logo

Nevada

2–4 · Unranked

VS.
Middle Tennessee logo

Middle Tennessee

3–3 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Nevada by 7.5

Nevada · 78%Middle Tennessee · 22%

Projected Nevada 29 – Middle Tennessee 21. Expected total 49.6 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Nevada: 85% for Nevada · At Middle Tennessee: 30% for Middle Tennessee.

MetricNevadaMiddle Tennessee
Current record2–43–3
Conference record1–21–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-8.4-18.3
FPI rank#98#130
Points per game23.023.9
Total yards per game361.8396.2
Passing yards per game171.8234.0
Rushing yards per game190.0162.2
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game22.629.6
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks12.07.0
Tackles for loss28.019.0
Current-Season RésuméNevadaMiddle Tennessee
Overall Record2–43–3
Conference Record1–21–1
Strength of Record#123#111
Strength of Schedule#124#123
Remaining SOS#74#106
Game Control#107#119
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.