2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Mississippi State logo

Mississippi State

4–2 · Unranked

VS.
Ole Miss logo

Ole Miss

5–1 · #12 AP Top 25

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Ole Miss by 6.3

Mississippi State · 25%Ole Miss · 75%

Projected Mississippi State 26 – Ole Miss 32. Expected total 57.9 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Mississippi State: 34% for Mississippi State · At Ole Miss: 82% for Ole Miss.

MetricMississippi StateOle Miss
Current record4–25–1
Conference record2–23–1
AP Top 25 rank—#12
FPI9.118.8
FPI rank#38#11
Points per game26.637.1
Total yards per game454.3444.5
Passing yards per game277.8290.7
Rushing yards per game176.5153.8
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game28.124.0
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.011.0
Tackles for loss32.036.0
Current-Season RésuméMississippi StateOle Miss
Overall Record4–25–1
Conference Record2–23–1
Strength of Record#20#9
Strength of Schedule#5#13
Remaining SOS#26#10
Game Control#33#6
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.