2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
Middle Tennessee
3–3 · Unranked
Marshall
3–3 · Unranked
Marshall by 1.5
Middle Tennessee · 44%Marshall · 56%
Projected Middle Tennessee 26 – Marshall 27. Expected total 53.4 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Middle Tennessee: 54% for Middle Tennessee · At Marshall: 66% for Marshall.
Current record3–33–3
Conference record1–10–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-18.3-16.5
FPI rank#130#126
Points per game23.923.5
Total yards per game396.2461.2
Passing yards per game234.0278.0
Rushing yards per game162.2183.2
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game29.629.8
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks7.06.0
Tackles for loss19.036.0
Overall Record3–33–3
Conference Record1–10–2
Strength of Record#111#95
Strength of Schedule#123#89
Remaining SOS#106#120
Game Control#119#121
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.