2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
Michigan State
2–5 · Unranked
Rutgers
2–4 · Unranked
Michigan State by 3.1
Michigan State · 63%Rutgers · 37%
Projected Michigan State 28 – Rutgers 25. Expected total 53.0 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Michigan State: 72% for Michigan State · At Rutgers: 47% for Rutgers.
Current record2–52–4
Conference record0–41–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI1.7-3.1
FPI rank#61#83
Points per game19.927.8
Total yards per game310.7403.8
Passing yards per game191.6265.8
Rushing yards per game119.1138.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.832.6
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks12.09.0
Tackles for loss32.027.0
Overall Record2–52–4
Conference Record0–41–2
Strength of Record#92#108
Strength of Schedule#16#54
Remaining SOS#40#33
Game Control#83#113
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.