2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
Miami (OH)
4–3 · Unranked
Massachusetts
4–3 · Unranked
Miami (OH) by 0.8
Miami (OH) · 54%Massachusetts · 46%
Projected Miami (OH) 26 – Massachusetts 25. Expected total 50.2 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Miami (OH): 64% for Miami (OH) · At Massachusetts: 57% for Massachusetts.
Current record4–34–3
Conference record2–11–3
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-9.8-13.8
FPI rank#106#118
Points per game27.026.5
Total yards per game357.9339.1
Passing yards per game216.3179.0
Rushing yards per game141.6160.1
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.821.1
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks14.015.0
Tackles for loss28.026.0
Overall Record4–34–3
Conference Record2–11–3
Strength of Record#94#116
Strength of Schedule#113#138
Remaining SOS#119#117
Game Control#81#105
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.