2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Miami logo

Miami

6–0 · #1 AP Top 25

VS.
Wake Forest logo

Wake Forest

6–1 · #14 AP Top 25

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Miami by 6.8

Miami · 76%Wake Forest · 24%

Projected Miami 34 – Wake Forest 27. Expected total 61.2 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Miami: 83% for Miami · At Wake Forest: 33% for Wake Forest.

MetricMiamiWake Forest
Current record6–06–1
Conference record4–04–1
AP Top 25 rank#1#14
FPI26.515.4
FPI rank#4#16
Points per game47.639.1
Total yards per game559.5445.9
Passing yards per game333.0290.3
Rushing yards per game226.5155.6
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game17.817.9
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks18.018.0
Tackles for loss31.049.0
Current-Season RésuméMiamiWake Forest
Overall Record6–06–1
Conference Record4–04–1
Strength of Record#5#11
Strength of Schedule#58#35
Remaining SOS#37#67
Game Control#2#14
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.