2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Massachusetts logo

Massachusetts

4–3 · Unranked

VS.
Sacramento State logo

Sacramento State

1–6 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Massachusetts by 13.6

Massachusetts · 91%Sacramento State · 9%

Projected Massachusetts 31 – Sacramento State 17. Expected total 47.5 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Massachusetts: 94% for Massachusetts · At Sacramento State: 13% for Sacramento State.

MetricMassachusettsSacramento State
Current record4–31–6
Conference record1–30–4
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-13.8-32.4
FPI rank#118#138
Points per game26.517.0
Total yards per game339.1302.3
Passing yards per game179.0194.7
Rushing yards per game160.1107.6
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game21.130.3
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.08.0
Tackles for loss26.027.0
Current-Season RésuméMassachusettsSacramento State
Overall Record4–31–6
Conference Record1–30–4
Strength of Record#116#136
Strength of Schedule#138#135
Remaining SOS#117#131
Game Control#105#137
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.