2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Massachusetts logo

Massachusetts

4–3 · Unranked

VS.
Bowling Green logo

Bowling Green

2–5 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Massachusetts by 6.9

Massachusetts · 77%Bowling Green · 23%

Projected Massachusetts 27 – Bowling Green 20. Expected total 47.2 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Massachusetts: 83% for Massachusetts · At Bowling Green: 32% for Bowling Green.

MetricMassachusettsBowling Green
Current record4–32–5
Conference record1–32–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-13.8-17.7
FPI rank#118#129
Points per game26.517.8
Total yards per game339.1280.4
Passing yards per game179.0174.4
Rushing yards per game160.1106.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game21.129.0
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks15.018.0
Tackles for loss26.037.0
Current-Season RésuméMassachusettsBowling Green
Overall Record4–32–5
Conference Record1–32–1
Strength of Record#116#125
Strength of Schedule#138#85
Remaining SOS#117#105
Game Control#105#122
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.