2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Kennesaw State logo

Kennesaw State

1–5 · Unranked

VS.
Middle Tennessee logo

Middle Tennessee

3–3 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Kennesaw State by 4.4

Kennesaw State · 68%Middle Tennessee · 32%

Projected Kennesaw State 28 – Middle Tennessee 23. Expected total 50.9 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Kennesaw State: 76% for Kennesaw State · At Middle Tennessee: 42% for Middle Tennessee.

MetricKennesaw StateMiddle Tennessee
Current record1–53–3
Conference record0–21–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-11.4-18.3
FPI rank#109#130
Points per game23.023.9
Total yards per game367.3396.2
Passing yards per game223.7234.0
Rushing yards per game143.7162.2
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.429.6
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks6.07.0
Tackles for loss24.019.0
Current-Season RésuméKennesaw StateMiddle Tennessee
Overall Record1–53–3
Conference Record0–21–1
Strength of Record#132#111
Strength of Schedule#87#123
Remaining SOS#122#106
Game Control#110#119
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.