2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
Houston
6–1 · #17 AP Top 25
Utah
6–0 · #3 AP Top 25
Utah by 4.6
Houston · 32%Utah · 68%
Projected Houston 26 – Utah 30. Expected total 55.9 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Houston: 41% for Houston · At Utah: 77% for Utah.
Current record6–16–0
Conference record3–13–0
AP Top 25 rank#17#3
FPI14.817.4
FPI rank#18#13
Points per game36.038.9
Total yards per game485.1486.7
Passing yards per game264.7266.3
Rushing yards per game220.4220.3
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game21.015.9
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks13.010.0
Tackles for loss35.026.0
Overall Record6–16–0
Conference Record3–13–0
Strength of Record#16#13
Strength of Schedule#44#102
Remaining SOS#48#39
Game Control#11#5
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.