2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Florida Atlantic logo

Florida Atlantic

4–2 · Unranked

VS.
UL Monroe logo

UL Monroe

0–6 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Florida Atlantic by 14.4

Florida Atlantic · 92%UL Monroe · 8%

Projected Florida Atlantic 40 – UL Monroe 25. Expected total 65.4 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Florida Atlantic: 95% for Florida Atlantic · At UL Monroe: 12% for UL Monroe.

MetricFlorida AtlanticUL Monroe
Current record4–20–6
Conference record1–10–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-10.1-26.3
FPI rank#107#137
Points per game37.820.3
Total yards per game422.3341.3
Passing yards per game307.3220.8
Rushing yards per game115.0120.5
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game35.837.0
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks8.09.0
Tackles for loss29.027.0
Current-Season RésuméFlorida AtlanticUL Monroe
Overall Record4–20–6
Conference Record1–10–2
Strength of Record#67#137
Strength of Schedule#93#117
Remaining SOS#80#113
Game Control#67#137
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.