2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Eastern Michigan logo

Eastern Michigan

4–4 · Unranked

VS.
Wisconsin logo

Wisconsin

4–2 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Wisconsin by 17.9

Eastern Michigan · 5%Wisconsin · 95%

Projected Eastern Michigan 13 – Wisconsin 31. Expected total 43.9 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Eastern Michigan: 7% for Eastern Michigan · At Wisconsin: 97% for Wisconsin.

MetricEastern MichiganWisconsin
Current record4–44–2
Conference record3–12–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-16.79.0
FPI rank#128#39
Points per game21.323.6
Total yards per game320.0351.8
Passing yards per game215.0199.7
Rushing yards per game105.0152.2
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.717.1
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks12.08.0
Tackles for loss36.025.0
Current-Season RésuméEastern MichiganWisconsin
Overall Record4–44–2
Conference Record3–12–1
Strength of Record#114#33
Strength of Schedule#119#20
Remaining SOS#109#65
Game Control#120#38
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.