2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
East Carolina logo

East Carolina

3–3 · Unranked

VS.
UAB logo

UAB

4–3 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

East Carolina by 4.6

East Carolina · 69%UAB · 31%

Projected East Carolina 26 – UAB 21. Expected total 47.5 points. No home-field adjustment.

At East Carolina: 77% for East Carolina · At UAB: 41% for UAB.

MetricEast CarolinaUAB
Current record3–34–3
Conference record1–12–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-5.2-13.8
FPI rank#90#117
Points per game24.021.6
Total yards per game339.5339.0
Passing yards per game183.7171.0
Rushing yards per game155.8168.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game24.125.3
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks17.015.0
Tackles for loss61.037.0
Current-Season RésuméEast CarolinaUAB
Overall Record3–34–3
Conference Record1–12–1
Strength of Record#104#89
Strength of Schedule#79#112
Remaining SOS#89#86
Game Control#91#127
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.