2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Colorado State logo

Colorado State

2–4 · Unranked

VS.
Utah State logo

Utah State

2–4 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Utah State by 2.8

Colorado State · 38%Utah State · 62%

Projected Colorado State 28 – Utah State 31. Expected total 58.3 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Colorado State: 49% for Colorado State · At Utah State: 71% for Utah State.

MetricColorado StateUtah State
Current record2–42–4
Conference record0–21–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-12.6-7.6
FPI rank#113#96
Points per game35.516.9
Total yards per game445.3310.0
Passing yards per game274.8189.8
Rushing yards per game170.5120.2
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game42.421.9
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks7.09.0
Tackles for loss24.028.0
Current-Season RésuméColorado StateUtah State
Overall Record2–42–4
Conference Record0–21–1
Strength of Record#110#103
Strength of Schedule#83#47
Remaining SOS#77#71
Game Control#114#109
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.