2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Air Force logo

Air Force

5–1 · Unranked

VS.
Central Michigan logo

Central Michigan

3–4 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Air Force by 12.4

Air Force · 89%Central Michigan · 11%

Projected Air Force 30 – Central Michigan 17. Expected total 47.3 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Air Force: 93% for Air Force · At Central Michigan: 16% for Central Michigan.

MetricAir ForceCentral Michigan
Current record5–13–4
Conference record3–11–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-2.1-14.3
FPI rank#79#121
Points per game29.317.9
Total yards per game407.0292.4
Passing yards per game64.0108.1
Rushing yards per game343.0184.3
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game21.525.9
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks8.012.0
Tackles for loss19.024.0
Current-Season RésuméAir ForceCentral Michigan
Overall Record5–13–4
Conference Record3–11–2
Strength of Record#49#107
Strength of Schedule#136#53
Remaining SOS#79#137
Game Control#94#128
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.