2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Charlotte logo

Charlotte

1–6 · Unranked

VS.
UAB logo

UAB

4–3 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

UAB by 10.8

Charlotte · 14%UAB · 86%

Projected Charlotte 22 – UAB 32. Expected total 53.9 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Charlotte: 20% for Charlotte · At UAB: 91% for UAB.

MetricCharlotteUAB
Current record1–64–3
Conference record1–22–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-21.9-13.8
FPI rank#133#117
Points per game20.621.6
Total yards per game310.9339.0
Passing yards per game199.9171.0
Rushing yards per game111.0168.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game40.325.3
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks11.015.0
Tackles for loss38.037.0
Current-Season RésuméCharlotteUAB
Overall Record1–64–3
Conference Record1–22–1
Strength of Record#130#89
Strength of Schedule#70#112
Remaining SOS#103#86
Game Control#135#127
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.