2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
Central Michigan
3–4 · Unranked
Ohio
5–2 · Unranked
Ohio by 8.9
Central Michigan · 18%Ohio · 82%
Projected Central Michigan 19 – Ohio 28. Expected total 47.6 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Central Michigan: 25% for Central Michigan · At Ohio: 87% for Ohio.
Current record3–45–2
Conference record1–23–0
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-14.3-7.1
FPI rank#121#95
Points per game17.929.6
Total yards per game292.4371.3
Passing yards per game108.1164.3
Rushing yards per game184.3207.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.921.9
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks12.013.0
Tackles for loss24.042.0
Overall Record3–45–2
Conference Record1–23–0
Strength of Record#107#76
Strength of Schedule#53#103
Remaining SOS#137#133
Game Control#128#92
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.