2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Central Michigan logo

Central Michigan

3–4 · Unranked

VS.
Eastern Michigan logo

Eastern Michigan

4–4 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Eastern Michigan by 0.5

Central Michigan · 48%Eastern Michigan · 52%

Projected Central Michigan 22 – Eastern Michigan 23. Expected total 45.4 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Central Michigan: 59% for Central Michigan · At Eastern Michigan: 62% for Eastern Michigan.

MetricCentral MichiganEastern Michigan
Current record3–44–4
Conference record1–23–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-14.3-16.7
FPI rank#121#128
Points per game17.921.3
Total yards per game292.4320.0
Passing yards per game108.1215.0
Rushing yards per game184.3105.0
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.925.7
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks12.012.0
Tackles for loss24.036.0
Current-Season RésuméCentral MichiganEastern Michigan
Overall Record3–44–4
Conference Record1–23–1
Strength of Record#107#114
Strength of Schedule#53#119
Remaining SOS#137#109
Game Control#128#120
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.