2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Central Michigan logo

Central Michigan

3–4 · Unranked

VS.
Ball State logo

Ball State

2–5 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Central Michigan by 3.7

Central Michigan · 65%Ball State · 35%

Projected Central Michigan 27 – Ball State 23. Expected total 50.5 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Central Michigan: 74% for Central Michigan · At Ball State: 45% for Ball State.

MetricCentral MichiganBall State
Current record3–42–5
Conference record1–21–2
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-14.3-21.1
FPI rank#121#132
Points per game17.922.0
Total yards per game292.4326.1
Passing yards per game108.1190.9
Rushing yards per game184.3135.3
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.935.3
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks12.010.0
Tackles for loss24.038.0
Current-Season RésuméCentral MichiganBall State
Overall Record3–42–5
Conference Record1–21–2
Strength of Record#107#121
Strength of Schedule#53#40
Remaining SOS#137#134
Game Control#128#123
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.