2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Buffalo logo

Buffalo

4–3 · Unranked

VS.
Miami (OH) logo

Miami (OH)

4–3 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Miami (OH) by 4.2

Buffalo · 33%Miami (OH) · 67%

Projected Buffalo 23 – Miami (OH) 27. Expected total 50.4 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Buffalo: 43% for Buffalo · At Miami (OH): 76% for Miami (OH).

MetricBuffaloMiami (OH)
Current record4–34–3
Conference record2–12–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-12.9-9.8
FPI rank#114#106
Points per game22.627.0
Total yards per game324.3357.9
Passing yards per game159.0216.3
Rushing yards per game165.3141.6
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.425.8
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks10.014.0
Tackles for loss32.028.0
Current-Season RésuméBuffaloMiami (OH)
Overall Record4–34–3
Conference Record2–12–1
Strength of Record#93#94
Strength of Schedule#110#113
Remaining SOS#136#119
Game Control#118#81
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.