2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Bowling Green logo

Bowling Green

2–5 · Unranked

VS.
Western Michigan logo

Western Michigan

5–2 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Western Michigan by 11.4

Bowling Green · 13%Western Michigan · 87%

Projected Bowling Green 17 – Western Michigan 29. Expected total 46.1 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Bowling Green: 18% for Bowling Green · At Western Michigan: 91% for Western Michigan.

MetricBowling GreenWestern Michigan
Current record2–55–2
Conference record2–13–0
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-17.7-2.5
FPI rank#129#81
Points per game17.826.2
Total yards per game280.4322.3
Passing yards per game174.4157.6
Rushing yards per game106.0164.7
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game29.019.2
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks18.016.0
Tackles for loss37.027.0
Current-Season RésuméBowling GreenWestern Michigan
Overall Record2–55–2
Conference Record2–13–0
Strength of Record#125#61
Strength of Schedule#85#104
Remaining SOS#105#128
Game Control#122#69
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.