2026 current teams
Program History ComparisonHead-to-Head
Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.
Showing the latest available data.
Bowling Green
2–5 · Unranked
Miami (OH)
4–3 · Unranked
Miami (OH) by 7.8
Bowling Green · 21%Miami (OH) · 79%
Projected Bowling Green 21 – Miami (OH) 29. Expected total 49.8 points. No home-field adjustment.
At Bowling Green: 29% for Bowling Green · At Miami (OH): 85% for Miami (OH).
Current record2–54–3
Conference record2–12–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-17.7-9.8
FPI rank#129#106
Points per game17.827.0
Total yards per game280.4357.9
Passing yards per game174.4216.3
Rushing yards per game106.0141.6
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game29.025.8
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks18.014.0
Tackles for loss37.028.0
Overall Record2–54–3
Conference Record2–12–1
Strength of Record#125#94
Strength of Schedule#85#113
Remaining SOS#105#119
Game Control#122#81
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——
Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →
How this is calculated
CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.
Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.