2026 current teams

Head-to-Head

Compare how two FBS teams are performing right now. For program history, use Team vs. Team.

Program History Comparison
VS.
Showing the latest available data.
Army logo

Army

4–2 · Unranked

VS.
Memphis logo

Memphis

5–2 · Unranked

CFB Intel Model · Neutral Field

Memphis by 5.4

Army · 28%Memphis · 72%

Projected Army 27 – Memphis 33. Expected total 60.1 points. No home-field adjustment.

At Army: 38% for Army · At Memphis: 79% for Memphis.

MetricArmyMemphis
Current record4–25–2
Conference record3–12–1
AP Top 25 rank——
FPI-0.03.0
FPI rank#69#57
Points per game33.637.6
Total yards per game426.7512.6
Passing yards per game69.2274.9
Rushing yards per game357.5237.7
Yards per play——
Points allowed per game25.523.6
Total yards allowed per game——
Passing yards allowed per game——
Rushing yards allowed per game——
Yards allowed per play——
Turnover margin——
Third-down %——
Red-zone %——
Sacks6.016.0
Tackles for loss18.040.0
Current-Season RésuméArmyMemphis
Overall Record4–25–2
Conference Record3–12–1
Strength of Record#81#57
Strength of Schedule#125#100
Remaining SOS#85#96
Game Control#79#55
Second-order wins——
Wins vs expected——
Average Win ProbabilityNot currently available——

Résumé data through Week 7 · Matches Stats & Info · View full Résumé →

How this is calculated

CFB Intel combines opponent-adjusted team strength, unit efficiency, current performance, and special teams. Ratings represent neutral-field strength. Home-field advantage is applied separately; missing inputs are excluded and the available group weights are renormalized. CFB_INTEL_MODEL_2026_V1.

Records, rankings, FPI, games, and team statistics: CollegeFootballData.